82
82
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 82
favorite 0
quote 0
tax code. but there are other things which cannot even be explained. why in the world would we put in our tax code a provision which says if an american business wants to move jobs overseas, we will give them a tax break to do it? i don't think so. that should be a decision, if they make it, with no encouragement from our tax code. rather, let's encourage businesses to stay in the united states. similarly, senator carl levin of michigan has really made a concerted effort to investigate and expose the offshore tax havens that cost us over $300 billion a year in taxes owed to the united states, people that park their money in far-away places with strange-sounding names end up escaping tax liability. why do we let that happen? the average family across america, the average business across america can't escape and doesn't even try to escape its liability. yet, we built into the tax codes these cayman island little fiascoes in bermuda and all the places they head to. we could put an end to that in a
tax code. but there are other things which cannot even be explained. why in the world would we put in our tax code a provision which says if an american business wants to move jobs overseas, we will give them a tax break to do it? i don't think so. that should be a decision, if they make it, with no encouragement from our tax code. rather, let's encourage businesses to stay in the united states. similarly, senator carl levin of michigan has really made a concerted effort to investigate and...
62
62
Mar 20, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 62
favorite 0
quote 0
under this government the tax rates are more competitive and the wealthy pay more tax. that's the right way around. here is an inconvenient truth for the other side. in every year of this parliament, the rich will pay a greater proportion of income tax revenue than any one of the thirty years of the last labour government. and during those years, too many people were allowed to get away with aggressive tax avoidance of abuse, they bogsed they were paying less tax and the member opposite applauded them for it. we stopped that. that's what i call fair. today i'm unveiling one of the largest ever package of avoidance measures presented in a budget, details set out including agreemented with isle to bring in over a billion pounds of unpaid taxes. new rules to stop abuse of corporate tax, and offshore employment. that's another 2 billion pounds. this year we're giving britain the first ever generally abuse rule and we will name and shame promoters of tax avoidance scheme. my message to make a living telling others to avoid the taxes, this government is not going let you get
under this government the tax rates are more competitive and the wealthy pay more tax. that's the right way around. here is an inconvenient truth for the other side. in every year of this parliament, the rich will pay a greater proportion of income tax revenue than any one of the thirty years of the last labour government. and during those years, too many people were allowed to get away with aggressive tax avoidance of abuse, they bogsed they were paying less tax and the member opposite...
75
75
Mar 13, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
we cannot tax our way out of this debt. there is no tax increase that gets us out of this debt. and to my own party, i say while we always have to have fiscal discipline, you can't cut your way out of this debt either. the only real solution to our debt problem -- and the debt matters because it's killing jobs in america -- the only real solution to our debt problems is a combination of two things. rapid, robust economic growth. if we could grow our economy at 4% a year, we could generate $3 trillion for debt reduction over the next decade. and we could create millions of jobs and pull people out of poverty and strengthen our middle class, which is the source of our exceptionalism as a country. and the second thing we need is fiscal discipline on future spending. this bill violates both. this bill violates both. it hurts economic growth because the only way you're going to grow your economy is if you make america a better place to create jobs and start businesses. that's how economic growth is created. when someone takes money they have or money they've borrowed or money somebod
we cannot tax our way out of this debt. there is no tax increase that gets us out of this debt. and to my own party, i say while we always have to have fiscal discipline, you can't cut your way out of this debt either. the only real solution to our debt problem -- and the debt matters because it's killing jobs in america -- the only real solution to our debt problems is a combination of two things. rapid, robust economic growth. if we could grow our economy at 4% a year, we could generate $3...
81
81
Mar 21, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
of course we have to pay taxes. this is not about paying taxes or not paying taxes. this is about the fact that there's only so much money in the world. and every penny that the government takes in taxes is money that's not available to invest in a private business. every time you take a tax, what you're doing, you're taking money out of the economy. you have to do that up to some point because we need a government. but if you do too much of it, then there's not enough money for people to spend at your business. if someone's paying more in taxes, that means they have less money to spend where you work, which means you're going to make less money in tips or in salary or may even cost you your job if taxes are too high. and i'm telling you, we focus on federal taxes here, but these -- these aren't the only taxes people pay. depending on where you live, you are paying local and state and now federal taxes. you add those up and there are people in this country that are paying close to half the money they make in taxes. half the money they make in taxes. how's that good f
of course we have to pay taxes. this is not about paying taxes or not paying taxes. this is about the fact that there's only so much money in the world. and every penny that the government takes in taxes is money that's not available to invest in a private business. every time you take a tax, what you're doing, you're taking money out of the economy. you have to do that up to some point because we need a government. but if you do too much of it, then there's not enough money for people to spend...
73
73
Mar 14, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 73
favorite 0
quote 0
seasked them to please shut theu tax takes because we understand the negative effect our taxes would have on our fragile o economy and the millions of americans still looking for alr work. it's also because we know washington democrats gotd rememe $600 billion in taxes they demanded earlier this year.han and $1 trillion they got in taxes from obamacare timegot in taxes from obamacare we tried that. in fact, at a time when americans believe about half of every dollar they send to washington is wasted, the democratic budget would increase democratic budget would increase they nearly 62%. it. and it will let medicare and social security drift ever closer to bankruptcy. and then there's the democrats' $1.5 trillion tax hike. that's trillion with a "t." let me just repeat that. any senator who votes for that budget is voting for a $1.5 trillion tax hike, the largest tax hike in american history. so the senate democrat budget is more than just disappointing. it's extreme. extreme. it's really one of the most extreme, most left-wing budgets of the modern era. it says something, i think, abo
seasked them to please shut theu tax takes because we understand the negative effect our taxes would have on our fragile o economy and the millions of americans still looking for alr work. it's also because we know washington democrats gotd rememe $600 billion in taxes they demanded earlier this year.han and $1 trillion they got in taxes from obamacare timegot in taxes from obamacare we tried that. in fact, at a time when americans believe about half of every dollar they send to washington is...
85
85
Mar 17, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 85
favorite 0
quote 0
must begin with tax. we know ronald reagan spent much of his life trying to cut for the average american. he was convinced it is the man or woman on the street didn't understand their dollar more wisely than the federal government. when governor jeb bush was in office, he cut taxes some floridians $20 billion. let's talk about the size of government. when matt mccomas in the wake has house come he to medically reduce the rate of federal spending and strove to reduce the size of the federal government. governor bush was in office, he vetoed more than $2.3 billion in earmarks for higher state spending and reduce the size of the state's government payroll by 13,000 people. when ronald reagan cut taxes and reduce size of the national level, he did it to spread the free market, create opportunity and provide incentives for businesses to grow. over 20 million new jobs were created. and governor bush's state of florida, the similar philosophy and economic programs create a thriving city economy were 1.4 million
must begin with tax. we know ronald reagan spent much of his life trying to cut for the average american. he was convinced it is the man or woman on the street didn't understand their dollar more wisely than the federal government. when governor jeb bush was in office, he cut taxes some floridians $20 billion. let's talk about the size of government. when matt mccomas in the wake has house come he to medically reduce the rate of federal spending and strove to reduce the size of the federal...
99
99
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 99
favorite 0
quote 0
higher taxes support even higher spending. this is the typical tax and spend budget. this budget was crafted as if we don't even have a spending problem or a debt crisis. this budget assumes everything is just fine and everything will work out if we simply proceed forward on the current path of tax and spend. this budget represents a missed opportunity. you don't have to take my word for it. editorial writers across the country have made similar statements about this budget. a "washington post" editorial called it a complacent budget plan. they wrote that the majority budget fails to recognize the long-term fiscal problems. i'd like to quote -- "partisan in tone and complacent in subject. it scores points against republicans and reassures the political liberal base but deepens these senators' commitments to an unsustainable policy agenda." further quoting -- "in short, this document gives voters no reason to believe that democrats have a viable plan for or even a responsible public assessment of the country's long-term fiscal predicament." end quote. the "chicago trib
higher taxes support even higher spending. this is the typical tax and spend budget. this budget was crafted as if we don't even have a spending problem or a debt crisis. this budget assumes everything is just fine and everything will work out if we simply proceed forward on the current path of tax and spend. this budget represents a missed opportunity. you don't have to take my word for it. editorial writers across the country have made similar statements about this budget. a "washington...
76
76
Mar 13, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
of reforming the tax -- for the purpose of reforming the tax code, bringing down marginal tax rates for businesses and individuals, he wants to raise taxes again. there is a bipartisan consensus, however, that tax reform should lower the rates and broaden the base. indeed, those were the recommendations of the simpson-bowles commission and the dim-rivlin panel as well. but as i said, the president wants to use what he calls tax reform as a trojan horse to raise taxes again. he argues that we won't have a balanced approach to deficit reduction unless we pass another massive tax hike, and that's after the president raised taxes by $600 billion in january muc. from what i understand, our friends across the aisle, senator murray as the chairman of the senate budget committee, are about to unjail a budget proposal -- unveil a budget proposal that would raise taxes again by at least $1 trillion. now, i realize if you think that government is the answer to almost every question that comes up with america today, that you're going to need bigger government, more intrusive government funded b
of reforming the tax -- for the purpose of reforming the tax code, bringing down marginal tax rates for businesses and individuals, he wants to raise taxes again. there is a bipartisan consensus, however, that tax reform should lower the rates and broaden the base. indeed, those were the recommendations of the simpson-bowles commission and the dim-rivlin panel as well. but as i said, the president wants to use what he calls tax reform as a trojan horse to raise taxes again. he argues that we...
70
70
Mar 13, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 70
favorite 0
quote 0
that's trillion with a t, in new taxes. including on the middle class. remember, washington democrats already got more than $600 billion in taxes this year. so where is this new revenue going to come from? charities? the home mortgage interest deduction? will they go after families and small businesses yet again? at least there's one thing we almost certainly know, their budget will never balance, not today, not tomorrow, not ever. if that was my vision for the country, and frankly i would want to hide from the american people too. look, a budget like that would be unmitigated disaster for our country. it would-be tray those who are going to need medicare when they retire. it would-be tray the younger americans who would be forced to grapple with the consequences of democrats failure to get serious about the debt. it would-be tray the hard-working middle class families that can not afford higher taxes especially in the obama economy. if that is the kind of budget senate democrats plan to offer it would sacrifice america's hopes for sustained economic rec
that's trillion with a t, in new taxes. including on the middle class. remember, washington democrats already got more than $600 billion in taxes this year. so where is this new revenue going to come from? charities? the home mortgage interest deduction? will they go after families and small businesses yet again? at least there's one thing we almost certainly know, their budget will never balance, not today, not tomorrow, not ever. if that was my vision for the country, and frankly i would want...
84
84
Mar 17, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 84
favorite 0
quote 0
governor jeb bush was in office he cut taxes on floridians by $20 billion. let's talk abut the size of government. ronald reagan was in the white house he dramatically reduce the rate of growth in federal spending and strove to reduce the size of the federal government. when governor bush was in office, he vetoed more than $2.3 billion in earmarks for higher state spending and reduce the size of the state government payroll a 13,000. when ronald reagan cut taxes and reduce the side of the government on the national level he did it with a purpose in mind. it was to spur the free market, create opportunity and provide incentives for businesses to grow. in his years in office over 20 million new jobs were created governor bush's state of florida is similar philosophy and economic or grams created a thriving state economy for 1.4 million new net jobs were added during his time in office. there are other fundamental report issues where the two men match. suspending the rising cost of health care improving education through accountability and school choice and as
governor jeb bush was in office he cut taxes on floridians by $20 billion. let's talk abut the size of government. ronald reagan was in the white house he dramatically reduce the rate of growth in federal spending and strove to reduce the size of the federal government. when governor bush was in office, he vetoed more than $2.3 billion in earmarks for higher state spending and reduce the size of the state government payroll a 13,000. when ronald reagan cut taxes and reduce the side of the...
125
125
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 125
favorite 0
quote 1
, massive tax hike. number two, half a trillion dollars more in big-government spending. number three, 42% more debt with each american owing $73,000. and more than 600,000 lost jobs. here's what we won't get: we won't get balance, just more and more unbalanced tax hikes. we won't get the kind of deficit reduction our country needs, just more spending to enrich the washington establishment at the expense of main street. we won't get more jobs or a better economy or sensible reforms to prevent medicare or social security from going bankrupt. and we certainly won't get a balanced budget. not only does the senate democrat budget never balance, ever, but top washington democrats now say they simply don't care about balancing the budget anymore. they just don't care about that. well, americans do. a party that once cared about hard-working american families seems to have gone off the leftmost edge of the reservation with this budget. d.c. democrats' priorities are so far removed from the actual needs of middl
, massive tax hike. number two, half a trillion dollars more in big-government spending. number three, 42% more debt with each american owing $73,000. and more than 600,000 lost jobs. here's what we won't get: we won't get balance, just more and more unbalanced tax hikes. we won't get the kind of deficit reduction our country needs, just more spending to enrich the washington establishment at the expense of main street. we won't get more jobs or a better economy or sensible reforms to prevent...
91
91
Mar 15, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
that's not tax reform. [applause] >> this white house has an insatiable appetite for revenues and more taxes. enough is enough. when it comes to education, what the dem credits extol the virtues of our one-size, fits all fact through r school where the child follows the dollar, and mean while let's support the education where the dollars follow the child. [applause] >> we had a union leader in louisiana who said that parents don't have a clue when it comes to making choices for their children. that's debate we need to have as a country. i melt with a group of moms and they say we make choices for our children every day. we know needs of our children better than the bureaucrat in baton rouge and washington, dc. that's the conversation we need to have today. these are just a couple of examples but we must fight the battle of idea or as margaret thatcher said, this is how we must win the argument. as i close, let me just share with you this. let me make this observation. america's facing her greatest choice. a
that's not tax reform. [applause] >> this white house has an insatiable appetite for revenues and more taxes. enough is enough. when it comes to education, what the dem credits extol the virtues of our one-size, fits all fact through r school where the child follows the dollar, and mean while let's support the education where the dollars follow the child. [applause] >> we had a union leader in louisiana who said that parents don't have a clue when it comes to making choices for...
99
99
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 99
favorite 0
quote 0
tax reform to hide a tax increase and peer at ickley politicians in tax reform is that what they mean is they want to raise tax reform. there are two ways, raise the rates or broaden the base without bringing the rates down. no raising the rates and if you want to get reductions in credit that's great. bring the rates down dollar for dollar. that is what ryan does in the ryan plan is perfectly consistent. >> host: let's bring in chris from florida on the republican line. good morning chris. you were on with grover norquist. >> caller: thank you. thank you for c-span. mr. norquist, i think there is a big problem. perception is everything when it comes to marketing and it's the perception that the democrats are able to get across because the democrats, they know their audience and they know who their pandering to. and they treat them like stupid children. i will give you an example. you remember when the bush tax cuts first came out and tom daschle and dick gephardt were the minority leaders. they didn't have anything. they didn't have the house and they didn't have the senate or the wh
tax reform to hide a tax increase and peer at ickley politicians in tax reform is that what they mean is they want to raise tax reform. there are two ways, raise the rates or broaden the base without bringing the rates down. no raising the rates and if you want to get reductions in credit that's great. bring the rates down dollar for dollar. that is what ryan does in the ryan plan is perfectly consistent. >> host: let's bring in chris from florida on the republican line. good morning...
81
81
Mar 17, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
so it's a 10% tax and every long distance call. so if we teach people to make free phone calls you're depriving the government of the money that it needs to send people off to fight and die in vietnam. so they had all these different groups that want to use this technology. but the one that i really focus on and touched on in the book, but the one that this book turns up to secretly be about is the curiosity, the curious teenager's. my book is about people being playful, being curious about asking questions like what happens if i do this? if i can hear these towns, what if the machines in your me? what happens if i doubt this number is on the phone but? the team that just permeates my book. and i would like to share with you to stories. one of them is about a blind kid who was -- well to not let me just read about show. dahlia the phone and leave alone joe was about four years ago when his mother for a shot to death president. it was a shot he would hear again and again is to grow. his mother could be forgiven for raising her voice
so it's a 10% tax and every long distance call. so if we teach people to make free phone calls you're depriving the government of the money that it needs to send people off to fight and die in vietnam. so they had all these different groups that want to use this technology. but the one that i really focus on and touched on in the book, but the one that this book turns up to secretly be about is the curiosity, the curious teenager's. my book is about people being playful, being curious about...
82
82
Mar 13, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 82
favorite 0
quote 0
is that tax helping to pay for these exchanges? >> guest: not yet. the tax has been paid yet. there's multiple taxes that took effect this year that does impact their expert patients this year. but the long-term tax down the road will pay for coverage expansion, which hasn't begun yet. >> host: dan, democrat until such, oklahoma. >> host: i have a union contract. so much of it goes to my wages. so much of it goes to my pension. so much of it goes to my health care insurance and so much goes to humility. i have a really good package. what i hear about this health care act is something i'm not sure it is. maybe you could explain to me. what we've got to eca go out out in a year and i want these repair jobs and that $50,000 that year. this is just an example. say that my health care insurance is in my contract is valued at 15,000. while i have to pay taxes and $65,000 at the end of the year? that's what i was sure have. i'll hang up that much to answer my question. >> guest: i'm not sure the affordable care act of love and there. if you have a private company to purchase health i
is that tax helping to pay for these exchanges? >> guest: not yet. the tax has been paid yet. there's multiple taxes that took effect this year that does impact their expert patients this year. but the long-term tax down the road will pay for coverage expansion, which hasn't begun yet. >> host: dan, democrat until such, oklahoma. >> host: i have a union contract. so much of it goes to my wages. so much of it goes to my pension. so much of it goes to my health care insurance...
112
112
Mar 16, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 112
favorite 0
quote 0
he said, well, they take about as much of my paycheck as taken out in taxes. that's how he saw it. i said, well, why don't you find another job? he said, if i could, i would. so there's obviously concern, these dues that are flowing from these low-paying workers and mid-level workers to very well-paid presidents of unions, and these are all available online, the data, how much the union bosses work from the lm2 forms. >> yeah. i'd also add right to work is a great policy. we strongly supported it at heritage. beyond right to work, i mean, sort of beyond the obvious i think that you have some very good suggestions there. there's a number of states where unions have exemptions from antistalking laws. so pennsylvania, a number of other states, special exemption from anti-stalking laws just for unions. and that allows the unions to put a lot of pressure not just on employers like dave, but on individual employees. and i think those exemptions ought to be removed. there's also a lot of exemptions from the anti-extortion laws for unions. so there's another rico violation being prosecuted
he said, well, they take about as much of my paycheck as taken out in taxes. that's how he saw it. i said, well, why don't you find another job? he said, if i could, i would. so there's obviously concern, these dues that are flowing from these low-paying workers and mid-level workers to very well-paid presidents of unions, and these are all available online, the data, how much the union bosses work from the lm2 forms. >> yeah. i'd also add right to work is a great policy. we strongly...
89
89
Mar 18, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
future tax reforms we're never going to allow tax reform to hide a tax increase. and periodically politicians say i'm for tax reform. well, what they mean is they want to raise taxes. there are two ways to raise the income tax; raise the rates or broaden the pace without bringing the rates down. and the pledge says, hey, no raising the rates. and, two, if you want to get rid of deductions and credits, that's great. but bring the rates down dollar for dollar. that's what ryan does. the ryan plan is perfectly consistent with the pledge. >> host: let's bring in chris now from spring hill, florida,en the republican line. good morning, chris, you're on with grover norquist. >> caller: good morning, thank you. >> guest: hey, chris. >> caller: thank you for c-span. yeah, mr. norquist, i think there's a big problem. see, you know, perception is everything when it comes to marketing, and it's the perception that the democrats are able to get across because the democrats, um, they know their audience. they know who they're pandering to. they know who they're selling to. and
future tax reforms we're never going to allow tax reform to hide a tax increase. and periodically politicians say i'm for tax reform. well, what they mean is they want to raise taxes. there are two ways to raise the income tax; raise the rates or broaden the pace without bringing the rates down. and the pledge says, hey, no raising the rates. and, two, if you want to get rid of deductions and credits, that's great. but bring the rates down dollar for dollar. that's what ryan does. the ryan plan...
74
74
Mar 14, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
this budget taxes too much and spends too much. this budget doesn't balance today, tomorrow, or ever. this budget keeps us at the edge of a fiscal crisis with no flexibility to respond to future emergencies. that being the case, this budget should be soundly rejected by anyone who cares about our nation's future and about prosperity and opportunity for america's middle class. now, madam president, i'd like to take a few minutes to talk about the temporary assistance for needy families or tan f program. authority for tanf expired in 2010. since that time the program limped along on short-term extensions. president obama never submitted a tanf reorganization to congress for consideration. senate democrats who have been in the majority since 2007 have never proposed a reauthorization of tanf. instead of submitting a reauthorization proposal that can be considered in regular order on a bipartisan basis, the obama administration instead unilaterally granted themselves the authority to waive critical federal work requirements. federal we
this budget taxes too much and spends too much. this budget doesn't balance today, tomorrow, or ever. this budget keeps us at the edge of a fiscal crisis with no flexibility to respond to future emergencies. that being the case, this budget should be soundly rejected by anyone who cares about our nation's future and about prosperity and opportunity for america's middle class. now, madam president, i'd like to take a few minutes to talk about the temporary assistance for needy families or tan f...
107
107
Mar 16, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 107
favorite 0
quote 0
and even though he paid taxes in the city, he was not allowed to get a library card. this court case -- um, so there were two cases going on at the same time. the court case for wilson and the court case for the five young men during the sit-in. arm steady booth, i think, understood the men weren't doing anything and there was no reason to make them serve any time for what they did or give them really any sort of punishment. is so it's been said that he asked for a continuance after continuance during the court case and eventually the charges against the young men were dropped. for the wilson case, the main issue was they were saying that when -- that the library, the alexandria free library was for alexandria citizens. wilson's case was that he was a citizen offal alexandria. during the court case they said wilson did not make it clear that he was a citizen, so therefore, she had a perfect right not to issue a library card to to him. eventually, the case was solved in that they were going to issue -- they issued, they went back, tucker went back with wilson and issue
and even though he paid taxes in the city, he was not allowed to get a library card. this court case -- um, so there were two cases going on at the same time. the court case for wilson and the court case for the five young men during the sit-in. arm steady booth, i think, understood the men weren't doing anything and there was no reason to make them serve any time for what they did or give them really any sort of punishment. is so it's been said that he asked for a continuance after continuance...
87
87
Mar 17, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 87
favorite 0
quote 0
, so it's a 10% tax on every long distance call, so if we teach people to make free phone call, we're dei have pry -- depriving the government of money to send people off to die in vietnam. so all these different groups that wanted to use this technology. but the one that i really focus on -- i touch on all of these in the book, but the one it turns out to be about is curiosity, about the curious teenagerrings. my book is about people being playful, about being curious, about asking questions like, you know, what happens if i do this? if i can hear these tone, what if the machines can hear me? what happens if i dial this number that's not in the phone wook? what if just permeates my book. and i'd like to share two stories on this theme. one of them is about a blind kid named joan who was -- well, instead of introducing him, let me just read about joe. hang up the phone and leave it alone. joe was about 4 years old when his mother first shouted that phrase at him. it was a shout he would hear again and again as he grew up. his mother could be forgiven for raising her voice. she tried t
, so it's a 10% tax on every long distance call, so if we teach people to make free phone call, we're dei have pry -- depriving the government of money to send people off to die in vietnam. so all these different groups that wanted to use this technology. but the one that i really focus on -- i touch on all of these in the book, but the one it turns out to be about is curiosity, about the curious teenagerrings. my book is about people being playful, about being curious, about asking questions...
76
76
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
so civilian victims right now have much more access to redress for military victims they have less tax action to justice. >> with the two victims that change the culture in the military? >> there are likely to get more justice in the system that is why it functions. but in the news and mainstream news with the civilian criminal justice system cannot give her justice. >> had to change a culture in the military? >> one piece but that panetta news last month only one specialty is far as reid no. but that goes hand-in-hand with sexual harassment and sexual assaults. >> to report your case how would that have changed how your case was handled and would it have shown? >> five lead had to reach back 20 years but. >> said in my case i presented the documentation necessary to move forward and they did not do anything. to have something come up so we could move forward but ultimately i would have been forced out or scared for my life. >> i am not sure if i would do much different a. so not this year but last year but the budget for everyone to go through the independent prosecutor cited challeng
so civilian victims right now have much more access to redress for military victims they have less tax action to justice. >> with the two victims that change the culture in the military? >> there are likely to get more justice in the system that is why it functions. but in the news and mainstream news with the civilian criminal justice system cannot give her justice. >> had to change a culture in the military? >> one piece but that panetta news last month only one...
93
93
Mar 21, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 93
favorite 0
quote 0
the problem with space and public support, support the translates into prioritized spending of tax dollars is that the public you space much as most people view their cars. they just wanted to work. they don't care about the mechanics or the combustion engine or how to build or repair the car. they just want to drive the car. similarly with space because of the resounding success of nasa and other organizations, responsible for putting substantial space infrastructure into orbit, americans, indeed, people all over the world, use their atm card, with gps and their cars and boats ever lie on the weather channel to tell them whether they should carry an umbrella totally oblivious to the role the space plays in providing that information. so in that regard the immediate benefit to space activity are not forgotten the most of the public. perhaps that knowledge was never known in the first place. space is associated largel largh exploration comments are considered expendable during times of economic restraint, something that can be put off until later. but the premise is incorrect, even regardin
the problem with space and public support, support the translates into prioritized spending of tax dollars is that the public you space much as most people view their cars. they just wanted to work. they don't care about the mechanics or the combustion engine or how to build or repair the car. they just want to drive the car. similarly with space because of the resounding success of nasa and other organizations, responsible for putting substantial space infrastructure into orbit, americans,...
61
61
Mar 19, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
they went door to door talking about taxes and government spending, and they flipped their state senate to a fiscally-responsible majority caucus. [cheers and applause] willing the torch of liberty, the constitution in our country perish or endure? if we stand and speak for our principles, if we show americans our vision for the future, if we fight for freedom, our country will endure. [cheers and applause] will you clink glasses with the powerful elite? >> no! >> will you link in the face of opposition -- blink in the face of opposition? >> no! >> or will you stand up and fight boldly on principle? >> yes! [cheers and applause] >> patriots, stand with us and fight for freedom! [cheers and applause] fight for our constitution! fight with us for the rights endowed by our creator; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! fight for a better future like ronald reagan did! [cheers and applause] like rand paul, michele bachmann, steve king, scott walker, like tea party patriots do around this country every day! [cheers and applause] and when you stand and fight, we will stand with you! whe
they went door to door talking about taxes and government spending, and they flipped their state senate to a fiscally-responsible majority caucus. [cheers and applause] willing the torch of liberty, the constitution in our country perish or endure? if we stand and speak for our principles, if we show americans our vision for the future, if we fight for freedom, our country will endure. [cheers and applause] will you clink glasses with the powerful elite? >> no! >> will you link in...
94
94
Mar 21, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 94
favorite 0
quote 0
does not go to the level of those destroyed causing not only lots of the home of the tax base. >> what about the ability to access insurance or cost of insurance. >> if you're not elevated above the flood on the latest reauthorization of the national flood insurance program going to an actuarial base rate if they will build one put up a bit look at a discounted rate showing the reduced risk. moving forward to smart actuarially sound basis is going to price many people to the point have to make hard decisions about elevation are not being able to rebuild based upon insurance rates. >> do you have any estimate so far of how much the cost of the disaster is borne by private insurance versus state governments versus federal government? do you have some breakdown on that? >> given about flood damage will be federal and commercial industry has not chosen to a flood insurance for homeowners peer preponderance is borne by the taxpayer and the flood insurance program. outside of that commercial entity that had insurance of even numbers done by the private sector. >> if i could i'd come to senat
does not go to the level of those destroyed causing not only lots of the home of the tax base. >> what about the ability to access insurance or cost of insurance. >> if you're not elevated above the flood on the latest reauthorization of the national flood insurance program going to an actuarial base rate if they will build one put up a bit look at a discounted rate showing the reduced risk. moving forward to smart actuarially sound basis is going to price many people to the point...
81
81
Mar 18, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
grover norquist, president and founder of the group americans for tax reform, joins us now. first want to get your thoughts on the news of the day, this new growth and opportunities project report out from the republican national committee. the chairman of the republican national committee is having a press conference that's started just a few minutes ago at the national press club talking about changes that the party needs to make in terms of outreach, changes to how to nominate a presidential nominee. your take on what you've heard so far. >> guest: well, i think, first of all, it's very important to do a postmortem on an unsuccessful campaign. republicans had every reason to believe that they'd not only keep the house of representatives, but would capture the senate and win the white house as well. and it didn't happen. now, at the same time the republicans have 30 governors, democrats have 20. at the state level, there are more republican state legislators than democrat state legislators. there are 25 states where the republicans have united control, governor and both ho
grover norquist, president and founder of the group americans for tax reform, joins us now. first want to get your thoughts on the news of the day, this new growth and opportunities project report out from the republican national committee. the chairman of the republican national committee is having a press conference that's started just a few minutes ago at the national press club talking about changes that the party needs to make in terms of outreach, changes to how to nominate a presidential...
87
87
Mar 18, 2013
03/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 87
favorite 0
quote 0
protection agency began under nixon and he brought in pat moynihan to even promote this idea of the income tax and so one and even though nixon backed away from it, it was a certain standard set about the welfare system in the country that you have to give maximum credit for. the philadelphia hiring plan and others so she was a pretty good domestic president. i talked to a guy named paul musgrave who said in the first three or four months of the presidency it was like a golden age if you go back and look at it again it's amazing. all the stuff is going on, new policies and ideas, and the public pieces, john osborn wrote for the watch and said the domestic policy meetings they sit around for hours laughing it and there on a whole different side of mixing. then it all stopped. he stopped. he lost interest. >> that is what makes him such a puzzle. >> i'm not suggesting that you are doing this but i was watching on c-span some clips from nixon's state of the union address. again, i am not suggesting this is a way of becoming healthy, but i did it. and i noticed him talking again and again about th
protection agency began under nixon and he brought in pat moynihan to even promote this idea of the income tax and so one and even though nixon backed away from it, it was a certain standard set about the welfare system in the country that you have to give maximum credit for. the philadelphia hiring plan and others so she was a pretty good domestic president. i talked to a guy named paul musgrave who said in the first three or four months of the presidency it was like a golden age if you go...